>I would say the "initial Crusoe processors have been tuned..." The two >processors announced have significant hardware differences (implied by >the white paper, anyway). I see no reason to believe that future >processors won't also have significant hardware differences. Right, I talked about that possibility at the end of my message. But now that I think about it, I can't decide what the next architecture for them to take on should be. PPC? Sparc? Alpha? Which would make the most sense financially for Transmeta? It is quite conceivable that any effort they might put in that direction might make them more money if spent instead on broadening and otherwise improving their line of x86-targetted processors. Vaughan
From Comp.sys.wearables Newsgroup Archive (CSW)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail