Return to the archive index

Re: Crusoe versus StrongArm, Super H, etc.

From: vrenios@enuxsa.eas.asu.edu (Alex Vrenios)
Date: Wed Feb 9 09:13:14 2000
Newsgroups: comp.sys.wearables

In article <86j11o$d78$1@nnrp03.primenet.com>,
Blair P. Houghton <bph@primenet.com> wrote:
>
>When I read the Transmeta website, I got a strong whiff of the
>RISC vs. CISC debate.
>
>The chip appears to be VLIW, meaning "variable length instruction
>word," but what that means internally I don't know (yet; I signed
>up as a developer, but they pleaded inundation and haven't sent
>a byte of data..). [...]
>
Take a look at their white papers, particularly "The Technology Behind
Crusoe (TM) Processors," at

	http://www.transmeta.com/crusoe/download/pdf/crusoetechwp.pdf

-- 
Alex Vrenios
Ph.D. Student
Computer Science Dept.
Vrenios@enuxsa.eas.asu.edu

Return to archive index | Next message in thread


From Comp.sys.wearables Newsgroup Archive (CSW)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail