Return to the archive index

Re: $20 key-glove

From: bph@primenet.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Date: Tue Jun 23 15:56:40 1998
Newsgroups: comp.sys.wearables

R. Paul McCarty <rpmc@troi.cc.rochester.edu> wrote:
>> ESD doesn't always involve a noticeable zap.  The least
>> noticeable discharge is several hundred volts.  Many electronic
>> devices can be discombobulated by just a couple of hundred
>> volts.  GaAs transistors can be destroyed but as little as
>> 100 volts, but I doubt your keyboard controller has any of
>> those in it.
>
>Probably not; its dated 1980 on the ceramic case.  

GaAs devices have been around a lot longer than that.  My
point was they're really expensive and not necessary for
something slow like a keyboard controller.  They're mostly
used for microwave RF amplifiers.  They're more rad-hard than
silicon, so they are also used for some military logic devices.

Wow.  1980.  I wonder what electromigration has done to it
by now.  Probably not a whole lot, considering the traces
on the chip would be about 10 microns wide...

				--Blair
				  "This message will self-destruct
				   in 30 days."

Return to archive index | Next message in thread


From Comp.sys.wearables Newsgroup Archive (CSW)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail