Return to the archive index

Re: Twiddler, cables, robustness

In article <899318554.20430.0.nnrp-07.c2de7070@news.demon.co.uk>,
"Ruth Bygrave" <woof@rbaf.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> So what *should* you do not to break cables? Unless a Pilot-specific
> batteried Twiddler comes out (if it ever does: Edward, if you're on this
> newsgroup, could you tell me if that is vapourware or is there a definite
> date on the project?) -- is there a way I can enjoy writing on a
> Twiddler/Pilot without breaking anything? And you lot w/ the Real Wearables
> must have even more cables than I have...

I don't like to speak for HandyKey in this sort of thing, and my hands
are a little tied in any case.  I can say that (a) I don't know of any
specific release date, and (b) the guys at HandyKey are definitely
interested in the Pilot angle.

But as far as dates, features, prices, etc., I either can't say or flat
out don't know.

+------------ Edward Keyes, daggerware@earthlink.net -------------+
|................ http://web.mit.edu/eakeyes/www/ ................|
|.... DaggerWare: "small, sharp, and with a heck of a point!" ....|
+- "A little inaccuracy saves a world of explanation." C.E.Ayres -+