Return to the archive index

Re: Processor types

From: bhurle1@umbc.edu (hurley bryan)
Date: Wed Oct 7 23:43:00 1998
Newsgroups: comp.sys.wearables

exactly, go to http://www.acorn.com and they have actual desktops running
what they say is the RISC OS, though they can run Linux I assume too. You
can get a pccard like piece of hardware with a 486 or 586 on it that you
can just stick in and run windows or dos or whatever on it, then when you
are done using the processor it gives all the memory etc that it was using
back to the main system; probably hot swappable too. That on a wearable
would be quite nice when you come into different environments.

They have some NICs, but the netwinder would be better at the moment.

using a 486/33/20/260 myself at the moment.

Bryan

In article <6vggpe$ico$3@nntp.Stanford.EDU>,
Mark Willey  <willey@keymaster.etla.net> wrote:
>If you restrict yourself to PC-104, this is true.  However, StrongARM is the
>best power/price/performance option.  If you're willing to do some
>customizations beyond stacking PC-104 cards, then go StrongARM.
>
>BTW, Intel is actively developing StrongARM.  They've got an entire design
>team down in Arizona working on it.  Unfortunately, I think they are going
>to bumble with StrongARM because they are uncomfortable with it's price and
>performance competing with the desktop.  "Intel, change happens.  Either
>make the change, or lose fighting it."  IMHO.
>
>Mark
>

Return to archive index | Next message in thread


From Comp.sys.wearables Newsgroup Archive (CSW)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail