> like mounting an M1 or something similar on the side of my glasses, > reflecting it by a mirror coating on the glass or something. Any comments > on the feasability of this? The reflected image from the M1 would be inverted (mirrored, obviously). You would need to invert the image from the M1 first. That's probably more trouble than it's worth. > Also, how about the possibilities of using a > small LCD or even LED display directly in front of the eye. I assume the > main reason for the size of the M1 is the optics, does that make this idea > impractical? The image directly from an LCD would be too small to read (for most people), even at 320x240. You may want to wait for the Olympus Eye-Trek to come out, which should be soon. A lot of people are waiting for it. It's what the new IBM unit will use. TekGear (http://www.tekgear.ca/) will be reselling it as their M2 to end users. -- Clifford Leong Tel: 609.490.1445 ZeroSpin Inc. Fax: 609.490.5530 http://zerospin.com Email:http://zerospin.com/ripley/
-- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail