Re: wearability index - was Large vs small - Backpack and frontpack.

From: Andrew Plumb <

>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:25:12 -0400


On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Charles J Knight wrote:
> 4cm^3 is nothing.  Think about it.  That's a 2x2cm x1cm thick 
> package...for reference, that's about the size of a woman's watch
> face, but 1cm thick.
[deletia]

Argh!  I meant (4cm)^3.

I give up.  Forget I even mentioned anything about this wearability index
thing.

Andrew.

--

Andrew Plumb, VE3SLG
mailto://andrew(at)plumb(dot)org
http://www.plumb.org/tekmage/
spk2_0.0.2:  http://www.plumb.org/tekmage/source/spk2/

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail