Return to the archive index

Re: wearability index - was Large vs small - Backpack and frontpack.

On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, -dsr- wrote:
> Well - as many hardcore bicyclists could tell you, a three liter 
> waterbag that is well-supported across your back is *much* more
> "wearable" than a 3000 cc rectangular box. Said bags curve to fit the
> contours of the body, yielding non-minimal bounding boxes but much
> greater comfort.

Hmm, how about having the components of a wearable mounted in some sort of
inert but slightly soft jel in a plastic pack?  That way the wearable
package would "automatically" sculpt itself to the contures of your body.
With the right jel you might also get some shock absorbing qualities as
well.

Tatty bye,

Jim'll

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail