-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Laforest writes: [...] (I've tried operating a Garmin 25 in many locations, including a passenger plane, and I wouldn't get *any* signal on a plane. But I have a growing suspicion of owning a particularly recalcitrant unit) > I though so too.... > > I brought my radio setup with me on a trip to British Columbia so > I'd have emergency radio and so the guys at work would have a laugh > tracking me over APRS...so naturally I want to try the GPS on the plane. > Being sometimes a really moral person <grin> I asked the stewardess if > she could ask the pilot if a GPS receiver was OK to operate. > She came back with the reply, looking very serious, that I shouldn't > ever operate such a thing in a plane. A GPS doesn't radiate much, though it does contain a DSP (it would be ill advised to do so, as it has to pick up very faint signals). But you mentioned a radio? I don't have net connection up right now, so I don't know what ARPS is, but you should absolutely, positively avoid radiating anything radio with any noticeable RF power within a plane. I shudder to think what even a 5 W source could accomplish to essentially unshielded digital electronics in focus of a waveguide. If I was the pilot I'd lynch you, and probably get away with it in court. > This left me *totally* puzzled. > Next time I'll ask again anyway, for I suspect either miscommunication > or genuine misinformation on the part of the pilot/stewardess. > I just can't stand absolute statements without underlying explanation. You seem to be oblivious of the fact that most of our civilization currently operates by ritualized canned algorithms, devised by (hopefully) tech-savvy people in charge. It is also imo best not to raise suspicions of the marginally tech-savvy people. I once transported a disassembled (desktop) computer in hand luggage, and (in the retrospect rather stupidly) brought on some attention of security on moi by nonchalantly dropping things like "Lockerbie" "Semtex" and "gas chromatography/mass spectrography" when the security people were wiping down the hard drive parts and motherboard with clean cloth for analysis (whether with canines or analytics, I was unable to find out). Never, ever volunteer nonessential information to algorithmically controlled people. Much mutual bafflement results, which wastes time and requires lots of explanations, which may lead to more explanations, etc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/> iEYEARECAAYFAjooIe8ACgkQhudim1f5z9NxZQCgv5O/Z3J1OXd9GRNjARvQqqOw uC4AoKEuaawsLPbYXvGzap0rOzrTY1pw =515H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org please, Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail