Return to the archive index

Re: Mobile Sensorium [was Re: Time for Serious GPS Application]

From: Doug Sutherland <>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:41:23 -0800

Eric Laforest wrote:

> How big is this getup (given your wanting to shrink things) ?

I have to admit that it's bigger than I'd like it to be,
but it's not too bad. The parts are soldered onto some 
permanent breadboard material. There are three circuits
of the following sizes:

  BX24 (GPS, LCD, and IR interface)  3 x 1.75 inches
  PIC  (TEMP, LED, and A/D convert)  4 x 2.25 inches
  PIC  (Pressure and Humidity)       4 x 2.25 inches

Although this sounds big, the boards are very slimline,
since the parts are soldered directly onto the boards 
and the boards are almost paper thin. I am just now 
working on enclosures for this. 

I have one plastic enclosure that is 5.5 x 3.5 x 1 
inch containing my GPS receiver, backup battery for
the GPS, PT6302 power regulator, and the BX24 circuit
for GPS, LCD, and IR interface. It has banana jacks 
for the power source, a DB9 cable for connection to 
the CPU, and cables for the LCD and IR decoder.

I can probably also fit one of the other circuits in
this same enclosure in the top half of the case, will
be experimenting with that today. If it fits that 
leaves one extra small circuit that is 4x2 inches 
and only about .5 inches high. But I also have to 
consider that I will be adding a charging circuit 
very soon (within days) for the NiMH batteries. 

Now that I have prototyped these circuits, I may 
try rebuilding them in a more closely integrated 
way. Keep in mind that this is all prototype at this
stage, and it will be streamlined as I go. I expect 
to end up with three enclosures (sizes estimated):

 - CPU enclosure (6 x 4 x 1 inch)
 - Power and GPS/LCD/IR enclosure (6 x 3.5 x1 inch)
 - Sensor and LED interface enclosure (4 x 4 x1 inch)

That's not too bad considering that I will have
onboard charging circuit (no battery switching) plus 
built-in capabilities for LCD/LED/IR/keypad, GPS, 
temp/humidity/barometer, and 12 A/D converters. 

My goal is to streamline this further by using smaller
parts (for example u-blox MS1E GPS) and doing a better
job at positioning the discrete components closer 
together on the circuit boards. I would like to end up
with just two 6x4x1 enclosures for the entire system.
In the future, based on a new CPU (MachZ) I'd like to 
then reduce that down to 4x4 inches, and keep trying 
to reduce the size as smaller parts become available.
But given my "jacket" (actually it's now a coat) is 
the container for this, it works out nicely even with 
two 6x4x1 inch enclosures, one on each side. My new 
batteries (individual cells) will also be evenly 
distributed around my waist to reduce bulk.

> Getting your body temp from an extremity is probably 
> not accurate at all.

I agree and I am looking for a good solution for this.

> Think of the places a thermometer is placed...(ick)...

Yeah well they aren't going there <g>

> leaves only the armpit as a workable location to get 
> a good measure of body temp.

That's not a bad idea but comfort is a concern, and 
also it makes it difficult to wear since I can't just 
slip on the coat, I need to feed the temp sensor 
under my shirt. Will have to think on this more.

> Finally, although the BX24/uController setup is 
> thrifty of serial ports, it is rather heterogenous.  
> Given that neither the BX24 or the microcontroller 
> can be reprogrammed stand-alone, wouldn't that make 
> it a pain to reconfigure?

Not really. Consider the PICs to be black boxes, they 
are permanently configured to do their jobs and do it
well, they will never change. The BX24 is kind of the
main "router" and it will change, but programs can be
downloaded via the RS232 port. The wearable itself 
can do the reprogramming without any extra parts.

> Cost aside, why not use a small cheap, serial-programmable 
> SBC like the New Micro ones ... It seems to me to be 
> more flexible, use fewer parts, and not be dependent
> on external hardware/software as the uC/BX24 are?

That's a possibility, but I will still need extra parts 
to interface these devices unless the SBC already has 
lots of 12-bit A/D converters, multiplexors, and the 
necessary filter caps and resistors. I haven't found 
one yet that fits my needs. Also, part of the goal here
is to experiment with the electronics and distributed
processing of these parts. If this was a commercial 
effort I would most certainly take a more integrated
approach, possibly with a small SBC add-on. But for 
now it's just a continuum of small experiments.  

  -- Doug

------------------------------------------------------------
  Grow your own Wearables: http://wearables.los-gatos.net
 What I'd like is to have you call me and my jacket answers
------------------------------------------------------------

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
please, Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/false domain

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail