>>Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:51:02 -0400 >If the anthrax scare did not turn out to be a hoax, the victim that did >not what to get the wearable wet, would surely be awarded the "Die >Hard Wear Hard" darwin award. As Michel Foucault once wrote: "Government loves a plague" (in the context of quieting civil unrest with claims of eminent plague). With this kind of reasoning "domestic preparedness" (e.g. military forces directed toward ourselves, and the declaration of martial law) becomes unstoppable, if what we value is safety and security above and beyond civil democracy. Dictatorship is far more efficient than democracy, when it comes to safety and security. Wearable computers documenting atrocities might be unacceptable to such dictators. Maybe societies that succomb to such reasoning should be awarded the Darwin award (those who willingly marched to death into mass delousing chambers???). I was thinking we need a version of the Darwin award for large groups. The new award (maybe we could call it the Mass Darwin award) would be analogous to the current Darwin award for individuals. Large groups of persons who acquiesce to safety and security and subsequently become victims to tyranny would receive the Mass Darwin awards. >However I suspect a 3101 phunny. read to the end of the article: "EXISTech Corporation's original facility proposal of April 1, 2000 (CA2303611) ... Happy April 1." -- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org please, Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail