Return to the archive index

Re: an OS alternative, memory questions, cordless phone data transfer

As stated ni another response, you could do it, but I honestly prefer a
bit more privacy than what the cordless phone internals provide.  I
suppose someone could roll their own crypto, but that still doesn't help
the interference problems...

Tone down the transmitter/receiver power?  That would help if you're only
looking for something around the house, but there are existing products
already, so why bother hacking open a cordless phone? (Because we can,
quite right :)...

Just my $0.02.

Timothy


On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Eli robinson wrote:
>
>   Also has anyone ever considered using cordless phone internals as an
> around the house data transfer system?

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
please, Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/false domain

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail