On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jon Knight wrote: > Fair enough for an OS and the multi-hop routing, but the Did you also get the localizer angle? Not digital pulse radio yet, though. > nano-computers would be several orders of magnitude smaller than what > the Berkeley folk appear to be aiming for. They're using (small) bulk Sure, but these are today's prototypes. > technology rather than nanotech. I was thinking more of the machines > that Drexler describes in "Engines of Creation" (available from the > Foresight Institute website at > <URL:http://www.foresight.org/EOC/index.html> - its been around for > some years but its still a good read if you've not touched on nanotech > ideas before). On nanotech scales doing RF will be an "interesting" Not exactly. I've read an early preprint of Nanosystems. In fact recently reality manages to make Nanosystems look dates. > problem. :-) You can always go to NIR, VIS and UV. Getting juice will be a problem, though, you need at least few 100 um for the microwave antenna to absorb. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3 -- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org please, Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail