Return to the archive index

Re: No action on the Z80? Who says? :)

From:
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:58:32 EDT

I like it.  A simple ROM-stored compiler may keep software dealers from 
hiding the versatility of computing from users as if programming were an 
esoteric privilege.  Jessica Mayo, I'm sure you're right about the C64.  In 
what other ways might we immitate the release of popularization of PC's to 
consumers as we attempt to popularize wearables for consumers? More ideas?

Clint Reese

In a message dated 5/7/02 9:20:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
writes:

<< But, in this project, I propose that we add a language, like ROM
 based BASIC, so that the user can customize their computer.  The
 "classics" all had this, and it made them MUCH more versatile tools.

 C64, VIC20, IBM PC, TI99/4A, TRS-80 series, TRS-80 Model
 100 laptop (still useful and classic, even today), Timex Sinclair, etc.

 Why they don't include a simple BASIC in Palms is beyond me.

      -- Chuck Knight >>

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail