On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Martin (cyn) wrote:
> those 2.2 QVGA displays though - those I can think of a plethora
> of great uses for. mmmm.
> I could only see using them one-high though, which only gets you
> 240 pixels deep
I was figuring a 2.2" diagonal measurment would work out to about 1.42"
high. Add 2mm on top and bottom for the frame and it bumps up to ~1.58"
(note: I messed up my conversion of mm to inches last time and ended up
with an erroniously short height {and width} for my hypothetical 4x4 array
-- sorry -- which also means it is _not anywhere near_ 166 ppi as I
reported). A roomy jacket sleeve could accomodate a row two of those high,
I would think.
Actually, two high x eight across would look wicked IMO. They each have
their own, built-in, controller though. I don't have a clue how to provide
separate synchronized video signals for each display.
-Chris
--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail