"Charles Bolton" <> writes: > I like your vision, but I don't want to go about the world lugging > different machines for deifferent tasks/contexts. > > I want my wearable to be cable of running big bore applications (like > statistical analysis and displaying a scatter plot with an equation that > best explains the variance in the series Leave the machine with serious crunch power at home on your network. When you need to get to that data from the field, the apps on your wearable should be able to get to the computer in your home pretty transparently. This isn't really much of a stretch -- I do most of my work this way now, though I use a laptop, not a wearable. > What we need is an operating system that let us design our own. This is > not for the consumer or the faint of heart, but it is the way to > optimize the kinds of tasks we have to do between the various activity > sets that make up our lives. Here, you've touched a point very well -- we don't yet know exactly what will work best in the way of wearable UIs, so the pioneers probably will end up figuring out what works best and building it for themselves. Large software companies will only get in the act after the way has been paved. -- Perry E. Metzger
-- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail