Sure, as long as any and all "auto" adjustments are optional... I can think of many situations in which I wouldn't mind background-level AI stuff going on in an overlay, but I would be annoyed if it forced itself on me -- as in a conversation. At 07:33 AM 11/7/02 -0500, Thad wrote: > >I've been arguing that head-up displays should do "autochromaticity" (adapting the computer display foreground to provide highest contrast with ambient >environment) as well as autobrightness and autofocus. As far as ease of implementation I suspect > >autobrightness is easier than autochromaticity is easier than autofocus > >yet I suspect that as far as importance: > >autofocus more important than autobrightness more important than autochromaticity > >or, maybe autobrightness should be first > >In actuality, I'm sure, like Rhodes says, "it depends on the application" -- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail