Return to the archive index

Re: SV-3 review: super-bright

From: R McCarty <>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:33:18 -0500

On Thursday 07 November 2002 07:33, Thad E. Starner wrote:
> I've been arguing that head-up displays should do "autochromaticity"
> (adapting the computer display foreground to provide highest contrast with
> ambient environment) as well as  autobrightness and autofocus.  As far as
> ease of implementation  I suspect

Why wouldn't you do autochromaticity to adjust colors to match ambient 
lighting? For example many monitors allow color balance settings to match 
indoor lighting. This is useful for doing photo/printing work to ensure that 
what you see on the screen appears the same as what you print. The human 
visual system automatically adjusts the perception of colors to filter out 
light sources that aren't perfectly white. I also know people who replace 
indoor lights, and/or adjust color balance of their televisions to match 
indoor lighting (since it's not the same as natural light). 

For example there are several perceptual experiments in which it has been 
shown that even with monochromatic light sources you can perceive colors. 
Wouldn't we want the HMD color balance to match the environment, so colors 
are perceived correctly?

Just a thought. :-)

-Paul

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail