Return to the archive index

Re: HMD cheaper than eyetop

i own a glasstron a35 that is ntsc and converted into a monocular (and paid alot less than that vr1...with similar specs, i found one with damaged audio on ebay and paid 175 us) which i run at 800x600 with extra large fonts and i think it looks pretty good!

the eyetop looks ok...but i think i can pack my glasstron down to something even less noticable then that...more to come :)

----- Original Message -----
From: Robin Lee Powell <>
Date: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:40 pm
Subject: Re: HMD cheaper than eyetop

> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:35:16PM -0700, Jennifer Pellinen wrote:
> > I found an HMD cheaper than the eyetop. It does both
> > video and VGA. I don't know if its any good but it
> > looks ok. http://www.vrealities.com/vr1.html
> 
> "180,000 pixel" -- isn't that like NTSC resolution, or something
> equally bad?
> 
> -Robin
> 
> -- 
> Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* 
> Robin."but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think 
> samely with me"
> -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to 
> http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o 
> prali .ui
> 
> --
> Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with 
> subject of
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
> Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
> Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false 
> domain
> 

--
Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail