sorry i never meant to say that the units display is 800x600 but rather that it is my display setting. i suppose what i am attempting to convey is that an ntsc resolution display can still be a pretty good wearable...and affordable to boot! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Lee Powell" <> To: <
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:42 PM Subject: Re: HMD cheaper than eyetop > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:31:41PM -0500,
wrote: > > i own a glasstron a35 that is ntsc and converted into a monocular > > (and paid alot less than that vr1...with similar specs, i found > > one with damaged audio on ebay and paid 175 us) which i run at > > 800x600 with extra large fonts and i think it looks pretty good! > > Ummm, that's impossible. NTSC resolution is 320x200, IIRC. > > It might be converting it on the way to the device, but either it's > not 800x600 or it's not NTSC resolution. > > -Robin > > -- > Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. > "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" > -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to
> http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui > > -- > Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of > "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
> Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org > Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain > -- Subscription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org Please, *PLEASE* don't subscribe through a forward/expander/false domain
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail