Return to the archive index

RE: Land Warrior?

From: "McCarty, Paul" <>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:37:03 -0400

http://mae.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&Subsection=Display&ARTICLE_ID=183384

-Paul
Paul McCarty
Sr. Electronics Engineer
MTC Technologies

(732)389-0244 x30

________________________________

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:23 AM
To: Wearable Hardware Discussion List
Subject: [Wear-Hard] Land Warrior?

Trying to improve the infantry's kit is like trying to improve a
bicycle.  It's hard because they're already so highly evolved.
Everything that's there is there for a reason and everything that's not
there is not there for a reason.  Usually that reason is insufficient
utility/weight ratio.

Whatever happened to Land Warrior anyway.  Googling just seems to
produce years-old vendor/program puffery even with the "last 3 months"
flag.

_______________________________________________
Wear-Hard mailing list

http://www.haven.org/mailman/listinfo/wear-hard

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail