> For what reasons would you prefer to see a moderated group versus an > unmoderated group? is it to prevent comercial spamming? or to limit > extraneous messages that don't belong in the group? Because my > impression is moderated groups are first harder to create and second > harder to maintain since somebody has to moderate the group. For commercial spamming I would guess. I posted it to wear-hard before and that was the only change that was suggested (IIRC). Personally, I was for unmoderated for the reasons you stated, but some others had differing opinions. > Other than that the writeup looks good. Did you post this and it never > went anywhere? or were you about to post it and didn't? I posted it as an RFD, but I never made it to a CFV. I should have, but again, I just got busy. You'll have to post it as an RFC again, but it went through with no problems last time, so it should fly. I'd really love for this to happen. BTW, while were expanding all this stuff, do we have an IRC channel? -- Gregory Martin Pfeil Programmer-Misogynist-BUFH-MIRC mailto:http://falcon.jmu.edu/~pfeilgm/ ICQ#: 235067
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail