I agree that most of the things I want to do with a wearable wouldn't require even a 486, but I agree that if you are running a hard drive and display and maybe a network card or wireless device you are using ~5watts already and the CPU isn't going to push you over 10, unless you get a 5x86 or better. If you look at the power specs for the 386/33s, your're only talking about 1watt, which is quite reasonable for wearable power consumption. I agree that some of the new chips like the NEC VR look fantastic for wearable apps but I would be really surprised if someone ported linux to this chip anytime soon. I think if you want a 24 hour wearable you should either try rigging up a display for a pilot (which successfully booted linux in Jan98 and runs a 16MHz 68xxx) or hack a windows CE palmtop. just my 2c -Paul Paul McCartyOn Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Joseph Gaffney wrote: > At 08:21 AM 3/3/98 -0600, Kent Lofley wrote: > >I know that 4mhz seems slow but it will work for the things that I > >want to accomplish with my wearable. I think that it is a cheap > >alternative that could run many apps, and be very profecient for and > >use little power but almost no one is willing to look into it. The > >pocket gameboy can run for 25 hrs on 2 AAA batteries. That is a > >million times better than any other wearable. Somewhat limited but > >very effective and possible. If you interested give some older > >technology a new chance. > > > >Kent > > Ok, you have to think this out a bit more. Do you remember 286's? I do, I > have one. It is 3 times the speed of a gameboy, yet I still feel like > popping the thing open and pushing the data (whenever I'm forced into using > it). Keep in mind as well that the 4mhz is the max speed of the processor, > that does not mean its ever going to get to 4mhz while doing some > processing (in fact, it probably won't). A 6mhz z80 in a calculator (The > TI-8x series) can be clocked at 2mhz. Say you can reach 2mhz with the z80 > in the gameboy. Don't forget now that you'll want some I/O there, because > of the need of a hard drive and other such devices. After this, what speed > do you think you'll reach? > > As far as 25 hours of life, don't expect half that. You're going to need > power for the hard drive (which is basically an improbable addon), the HMD > (even if you use the screen as I suggested, you may need to make some > modifications), and any other device you have hooked up to it (which will > probably entail an I/O card so you can add things on later). > > While it would be nice, it may be more... effective... to think about some > other chip, such as those used in PDA's (Such as the NEC VR series, my > choice). > > > > - Joseph Gaffney > -
> - http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/ > - http://www.ArchAgency.com/ >
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail