Ditto Re: post below, yet it is interesting to see the bailout traffic, I wonder what's the ratio to signons &/or current total reading volume. I think the only chap who didn't get the clue and kept on *removing* was a from an "emergency management school"! Now there's an area for public interest of an important use for wearables, the ability to be able to be connnected to any and all necessary info/data/com ASAP, away from your desk or dashboard. The state police are notorious for not wanting to get too far from their 'wearable' car's com/com. They are a good example of how autos are a primary metaphor to wearables than are desktops, a Lizy will get you "wear you want to go today". (go ahead mrBil use it!) A worthy marketable focus may be for; cops, emts, vol fire folk, etc., these areas are mildly subsidized, are donation and voter/tax centric, wide-volume, with public interest & support, etc. They also may not suffer from borg prejudices, & would ultimately offer a boost to wearables development. .02 tris In a message dated 98-07-01 11:31:07 EDT, you write: > Subj: Re: remove > Date: 98-07-01 11:31:07 EDT > From:(jessica forbess) > To:
> CC:
> > > > I don't really understand why everyone is trying to remove themselves from > this list, but I'm amazed at the number of people who are doing it so > incompetently. I can overlook the occasional failure, but the number of > people who aren't bothering to even ask how to remove themselves is really > beginning to annoy me. > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS LIST: > > first, address your mail to
. No one reading > the list is going to remove you. It's done automagically, don't you know? >
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail