Return to the archive index

Re: a launchable rocket

From: "Timothy D. Gray" <>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 20:50:13 -0400 (EDT)

One thing I saw at the High power Model rocket society here in michigan
was that the telemetry computers were Parallax Basic stampII computers, 1
for data collection and transmission and 1 for rocket control (I.E. self
destruct, motor kill, course correction) The motors they used were liquid
based (Kerosene and Liq O2 whic happens to be what powered the saturn 5) A
wearable in this field has little use , as VR seems to be best suited.
(Portability of mission control is not a concern) I saw only test fires of
the motor and no actual flights they flew only solid boosters. The only
application I saw for a wearable was during pre-flight and vehicle repair,
and due to the small size of these rockets a laptop works fine... (The
space shuttle on the other hand, they use wearables for tile inspection)
BTW, I saw a demo of what Liq O2 and charcoal briquets does.. Not
something to be messed with....)

On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Michael Sharp wrote:

> Jim Stiles wrote:
> > 
> > I am working on some fairly advanced rockets with a friend - we are
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Jim, 
> I am perhaps the only other person on this list that was once certified
> (ATF licensed as well) to fly high-powered rockets. I used an I-Max on
> and H sized motor. I could have gone to J-sized but after my initial
> certification, I got out of rocketry totally. Reason: Certification
> costs, annual recertification with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
> Fire Arms, and the costs of motors, not to mention, that because of
> recent laws, its illegal to own high powered motors unless you just
> happen to have a bunker in your back yard. BTW, for the rest of reading
> this post, yeah.. I know its not a "wearable issue", so I'll be short
> and to the point. And if you're wondering why the ATF is involved, its a
> whole can of worms.. basically, they're worried about safety issues
> concerning high-powered motors.
> 
> > The parameters for the space available is that it is as long as it needs to
> > be, 6 inches in diameter, and the whole system will be subject to lots of
> > G's (like in the low hundreds range, depending on motors, etc).
> 
> In this case the *best* way to make a computer is to go totally i.c. You
> can buy small computer made just for data logging, but if you're a
> programmer, and dont mind working with 8-bit, you can use the Microchip
> 16c74. It has an 8-channel A/D converter on board, and 4k of program
> space.. contact me if you need more specs... People that I know have had
> equipment *destroyed* during launch, because good constructions tactics
> where not used. I've seen boards blown to shreds, not to mention good
> working camcorders (used in flight) totally trashed during acceleration.
> You *must* build a good, sturdy board, possible reenforced if possible,
> if you're going to make this work. Battery power need only be powerful
> enough for the launch and recovery. You can keep your logger "hot" with
> ground support equipment until launch.
> 
> > significant issue - I ran a TI micro system almost 20 years ago that had
> > enough cycles to do this stuff (although the OS was BASIC, so presumably
> > something real will require a little more horsepower).
> 
> If you're interested in a BASIC chip, there is a BASIC version of the
> 8052 out (8052AH-BASIC). It has an 8k BASIC interperter on board, and
> can access 64k of ram. I built a mobile robot around one of these i.c.s.
> BTW, JameCo has these 8052's and a company named Prologic has the board.
> Again, contact me if you need further assistance.
> 
> > 
> > If anyone has suggestions (OS, processor, A/D interfaces, etc), I would
> > love to hear them.
> 
> Yeah.. I put 3 years of research into making an accelerometer. I have an
> ultra-simple design that costs just a few dollars, and can out put an
> analog (0-5v) signal proportionate to acceleration.. I'll give you the
> basic design if you want it...
> 
> OK.. "Cyborgs" I've said enough. If anybody else has anymore rocket
> questions they would like to ask me, please email directly. Thank you.
> -Mike :)+<
> 

Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail