Return to the archive index

RE: Wearable Thinclient

From: Peter Cochrane <>
Date: 3 Sep 1998 13:43:00 +0100

Best option for what/who? P
_______________________________________________________________________________
To: Peter Cochrane; liquid
Cc: 'w-h'
From: Timothy Gray on Thu, Sep 3, 1998 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: Wearable Thinclient
RFC Header:Received: by maczebedee with ADMIN;3 Sep 1998 13:39:19 +0100
Received: from dent.axion.bt.co.uk by rambo with SMTP (PP);
          Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:41:21 +0100
Received: from lambdanet.com by dent (PP) with ESMTP;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:37:40 +0100
Received: from wierdness.Lambdanet.com (wierd.lambdanet.com [205.138.137.217])

          by lambdanet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA07544;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1998 08:37:16 -0400
Message-Id: <>
From: Timothy Gray <>
To: Peter Cochrane <>, liquid <>
Cc: 'w-h' <>
Subject: Re: Wearable Thinclient
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 08:31:25 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

A thick client is near useless if not on a network? well true, any "client"
machine has the problems with depending on a server for storage. that's why
a full blown computer as a wearable is the best option.

----------
: From: Peter Cochrane <>
: To: liquid <>; Timothy Gray <>
: Cc: 'w-h' <>
: Subject: RE: Wearable Thinclient
: Date: Thursday, September 03, 1998 5:49 AM
: 
: A thick client is useless if your battery is flat... or near useless if
it is
: not on a network.  Trains have 100% GSM in Europe, and train and road
tunnels
: have leaky feeders...I'm very seldom off line from my lap top anywhere in
: Europe and down through SEA - Australia - all have GSM.  P
:
____________________________________________________________________________
___
: To: liquid; 'Peter Cochrane'
: Cc: 'w-h'
: From: Timothy Gray on Wed, Sep 2, 1998 10:23 pm
: Subject: Re: Wearable Thinclient
: RFC Header:Received: by maczebedee with ADMIN;2 Sep 1998 22:23:06 +0100
: Received: from dent.axion.bt.co.uk by rambo with SMTP (PP);
:           Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:25:12 +0100
: Received: from lambdanet.com by dent (PP) with ESMTP;
:           Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:21:44 +0100
: Received: from wierdness.Lambdanet.com (wierd.lambdanet.com
[205.138.137.217])
: 
:           by lambdanet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA07338;
:           Wed, 2 Sep 1998 17:20:58 -0400
: Message-Id: <>
: From: Timothy Gray <>
: To: liquid <>, 
:     'Peter Cochrane' <>
: Cc: 'w-h' <>
: Subject: Re: Wearable Thinclient
: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 17:23:51 -0400
: X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
: X-Priority: 3
: X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
: MIME-version: 1.0
: Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
: Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
: 
: True, but a thinclient is 100% useless if you are out of range, on a
train,
: driving throught the chunnel,working in the xray lab... etc... A
thinclient
: wearable has a use in controlled environments. The only problem is that a
: wearable is in the most un-controllable environment, on the human body.
: Therefore a useable wearable will have to do most of it's processing and
: storage locally and then do the transfers whenever it has time/access.
The
: cellular/sattelite communications option is not a serious option for a
: wearable unless you have gobs of cash, Military wearables probably use a
: sattelite burst system, or a long range radio telemetry system while
moving
: as sattelite communication from a personal device that is moving is near
: impossible.
: 
: I dont want thin or thick client... I want super-fat-gobs-o-storage
server.
: 
: ----------
: : From: Tony Havelka <>
: : To: 'Peter Cochrane' <>
: : Cc: 'w-h' <>
: : Subject: RE: Wearable Thinclient
: : Date: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 4:15 PM
: : 
: : Agreed. So that brings us to the issue of transport, and cost thereof. 
: In
: : an office environment, one can be physically wired to a network or
: connected
: : through a local wireless system.  Costs associated with this topology
: range
: : from $0 to a fraction of a cent per megabyte.  Move to a cellular based
: : system, bump that cost up to dollars per megabyte. Move to a
: : sideband/wideband system, $10's of dollars per meg.  Satellite, even
: more.
: : The key to a thin client will be cheap access to the server.
: : 
: : - Tony
: : 
: : > -----Original Message-----
: : > From: Peter Cochrane [mailto:]
: : > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 2:45 PM
: : > To: liquid
: : > Cc: 'w-h'
: : > Subject: RE: Wearable Thinclient
: : >
: : >
: : > On or off line all the time or sporadically, thin or thick, narrow or
: : > wideband, with or without a display, voice or key I/O -
: : > provided it brings
: : > computing and communication power to me who cares? Pkey
: : > ______________________________________________________________
: : 
: : --
: : Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
: : "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
: : Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail