Return to the archive index

Re: Scream-N-104 from Parvus: prices?

Roland Orre wrote:
> Any good reasons going with the Scream/104 solution instead, which may
> be cheaper? How about cooling, compactness and reliability?
> 

Here is a previous post on this list about the scream board.
-Paul

Dr. Terrance Boult wrote:
> 
> >>Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 14:45:48 -0500
> >>From: <>
> >>CC: 
> >>Resent-From: 
> >>X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/2001
> >>X-Loop: 
> >>Precedence: list
> >>Resent-Sender: 
> >>Content-Type: text
> >>Content-Length: 287
> >>
> >>
> >>>If they didn't, did they at least tell you when these things would be
> >>>available for purchase?
> >>
> >>To my knowledge they are available now.  I received the official flyer
> >>a while ago.....maybe I'm confused.
> ....
> 
> They are definitely available (though only the 120 and 133, 166 is not
> available till may).  I received mine a week or two ago.. From memory it was
> 650 for the carrier board and 725 for the CPU module, 125 for the cables.
> They also carry a pc104-plus VGA card (someone else's, versalogic if I
> recall).  I'll post some numbers on performance and power when I get around
> to testing it but from their from their mail to me...
> ...The power consumption of the boards all together is about 7.5W for the
> ...ScreamN/104 and MMS Gemini module, and about 2.25W for the Versalogic
> ...board (only +5VDC needs to be supplied), for a total of approximately
> ...10W average for the two boards.
> 
> Terry Boult --- Vision and Software Technology Lab, EECS Dept. Lehigh Univ.
>                    http://www.eecs.lehigh.edu/~tboult

-- 
R. Paul McCarty / DARS Coordinator /  / x52059
317 Lattimore Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Computers don't make mistakes;what they do,they do on purpose.-Dale/KOTH

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail