Return to the archive index

Re: WinCE & Linux

From: Rudy Moore <>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 22:30:09 -0500 (CDT)

> In a message dated 10/5/98 3:22:45 PM PDT,  writes:
> 
> << Not to beat a dead horse or anything.. but when you say
>  that word, make sure you jerk your body a little and pronounce
>  it the way the Webster's would say to pronounce "wince". >>
> 
> LOL.  We do call it wince here, Rudy.  But you didn't answer my question about
> Dragon...

True.. true...

Well, there's a couple big problems with bringing real voice recognition
to wince machines.  First - most (if not all) wince processors are optimized
toward power consumption over speed.  Even the fabulous StrongArm isn't
really capable of the kind of performance the El-Cheapo desktops can do
these days.  Performance will improve - greatly over the next few years -
but probably not fast enough for our tastes.

The second problem is that wince (ouch!) machines aren't binary compatable.
So even though they claim to have some huge market share, wince machines
can't exploit that market effectively by sharing software titles.  And should
a byte code machine magically appear that all wince devices _can_ execute the
same code ... well, you just ate up all your processing power interpreting
silly little instructions - nothing left for your speech recognition.

I'm waiting for the day when one of the operating systems producers finally
says, "Okay, we're going to do it.  The machine of the star trek universe
is going to appear in this reality," and sells a computer without a keyboard.
It'll happen.  Someday.  Whether it'll sell... well.. that's a question for the
marketing gurus out there.

Rudy

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail