Return to the archive index

Re: Lizzy Vs WearComp6

From: <>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 18:52:53 -0500

They're basically variations on the same base design I put together
when specing out the MIT project's requirements.  The best thing to do
is to look over both sets of instructions for the "tricks of the
trade" and then mix and match for what you want.

Personally, I think the best route is to make a Lizzy, but using an
Ampro VGA card (low power) and an M1 display (modify mount for your
head) instead of the Private Eye (unless you can get one - still my
most used display).  Combine this with Steve's power bridge
instructions and other tricks and you have a nice machine.

This way you get the benefits of both sets of instructions.  The Lizzy
is good because of its detailed parts list, specific steps, and long
testing by many people - the web instructions are still the base of
most of the wearables made at MIT.  Steve's instructions cover some of
the power and VGA/NTSC issues I ignored in the published version.  In
actuality, we spent a long time trying to spec out decent VGA boards.
Advantech SVGA has the picture quality of a true 24-bit card but draws
a lot of power; Ampro SVGA-II has OK quality for much lower power
(ampro SVGII with 1M VRAM cirrus logic chip .5W); Jump is equivalent
to Ampro but with slightly higher power (1W).

						Thad Starner
						MIT Media Laboratory
						Wearable Computing Project

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail