Return to the archive index

Re: I highly suggest PC/104 or smaller boards

From: Brenden Tuck <>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 03:33:19 -0500

>	Form factor and robustness is extremely important for
>wearables.  SBC's (single board computers) are generally big and not
>designed to deal with heat properly.
>
>	Of course, those who have been running such SBC's should feel
>free to disagree....
>
>						Thad Starner
>						MIT Media Laboratory
>						Wearable Computing Project

You may want to check out the Mighty Mite SBC from Cell Computing,
depending on your time frame.  The form factor at 4"x 5.5" won't be
much larger than a PC/104 card, but it includes an extra serial port,
a USB port, a PC/104 bus and an AMD ethernet controller in addition
to all of the standard CardPC hookups.

According the rep who attended the ISWC, it is supposed to be
released later this month at a price tag of $399 in developer
quantities.  So far, the Cell Computing folks have been very cool
to work with.

The web site lists it as a Pentium class SBC, but in reality, it will
run any of the CardPC series.  I do plan on purchasing one to play
with once they become available, so I will post more then.

On a totally separate note, I am working on the final hookups to the
MicroDisplay developer kit I brought to the 98ISWC.  I will be posting
a full photo shoot of my design shortly on the wearables.ml.org
website for those interested in a semi-cheap 640x480 greyscale
VGA monocle system (read barely under $1250).

--Friar

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail