Return to the archive index

Re: Shopping.com deemed incompetent

From: "R. Paul McCarty" <>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 22:25:54 +0000

 wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> You may recall my mail describing the cheap, cheap
> prices on shopping.com and how I received my
> Sony Lithium NP-F750 battery in a fairly timely
> fashion.  This mail is to NEGATE ALL THE GOOD
> FUZZIES I got from them from that one shipment.

Last time I checked shopping.com (this morning) it was just a portal to
online vendors.  I've been very happy with all of the orders I've placed
based on prices from shopping.com.  And I've ordered from a different
vendor every time. :)

What company did you order from if it wasn't shopping.com?

-Paul
-- 
R. Paul McCarty / DARS Coordinator /  / x52059
317 Lattimore Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Computers don't make errors; what they do, they do on purpose.-Dale/KOTH

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail