> Well, its an interesting idea, but it poses some serious problems; > > One, for Dragon Naturally Speaking, they'd have to talk directly into the > microphone at a distance of about 6 inches, and the background noise would > have to be kept at a minimum; Also, you'd need to lead a different 'speech > pack' for each language, as languages have differing vowel sounds and > consonants from ours that would be misrecognised. I've been wondering about that. Do they sell mini-parabolic mics, or perhaps mini-shotguns? Something with *good* directionality. My idea is to attach one of these to, say, a finger, and then just point the mic at whatever I want to hear - your mouth, or whatever. Might also work for the crowded-cocktail-party effect. The problem I see for a mult-translator is you have to set it to the language they're talking in before they start speaking. Heck, even a human has a hard time figuring out what language you're speaking, if you tend to switch between 3 or 4 languages. > .Now, the reverse way, where it translates *your* words, perhaps puts them on > a little Matrix Orbital LCD, sounds actually quite usable. The mike is close > enough, it would be trained to your voice, and you could either have > translation software or pipe the text through Babelfish if you have a net > connection. It might be nice to have the running text of everything I say all of the time. Then again...maybe not. ;-) Alex Feinman -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail