"Tristram W. Metcalfe III" wrote: > Thanks Mark for the update, having read about it long ago, I neglected to follow these efforts > thinking it was stand allone, not the appearantly wise opportunity to add to the fuzzy sound > content in voice recogniton. (reading disabilities do take their toll). > > A 1 to 17 probability would drop fast even with the fuzzy sounds, as a "b" and a "p" (same lips) > should easily catch the voiced "b" vs "p" unvoiced. > > It seems happily that there are many seeking to improve via lips in the (strill) not so great > state of the art in voice recognition. On Scientific American Frontiers, I remember Allen Alda talking about some kind of new technology or some such that is *truly* speaker independent. Anyone hear anything lately on this? > > Sorry to sprinkle a little water on Xunker's flames, but with a breakthrough in voice rec who > knows what will break through?,,, If so,, the vast # of voice apps then comming to life would > likely shrink fast to the low cost light weight ICs for those 'single chip' based WCs we'll be > wearing someday, hopefully long before mearly just surfing in a nursinghome. What flames? :) I'm just glad that there's hope for all of us yet! What can i say, I'm an antagonist; glass half empty and all that. > > Appearently an hmd though not required for face/lip finding, would still provide better targeting > (personal selection) and of course the very *many* other hmd values to the rigs. > Right.. Its not considered rude to to look someone the face whilst they're talking to you... In fact, I think its preferred. -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail