>wrote: > > It sounds like what you're describing would only work for the wearer. In > > other words, a noise-cancelling mike. These are commercially available, > > although they work a little differently from what you describe. They are > > basically open on both sides of the element, so the user (usually a pilot) > > talks (applies sound pressure) to only one side of the element, while any > > other sound (engine/cockpit noise, for example) hits both sides of the > > element equally, and doesn't register. Or at least that was the theory as > > described to me in flight school. > > The only problem with these mikes is that they are not very senstive, and > > you literally have to hold one up to your mouth close enough that your lips > > brush it. > > Though perhaps one could duct-tape a shotgun mike to the shank of one's > glasses to pick up whomever one was looking at. :) Well, if you're going to start with your mil-spec RPGs to begin with, I guess that won't make 'em look any worse. 8-) (NB: RPGs= Rape Prevention Glasses. These things are Ugly!) > I'd think that any sort of omni-directional noise reduction thingie > wouldn't work well enough for speech recognition to work accurately > unless one was in a fairly quiet place to begin with... Definitely not > walking down the sidewalk. you've got that right. These noise-cancelling mikes do work very well in extremely noisy places, though. If you've ever been in a Cessna 152, you know what I mean. Paul Archer ---------------------------------------------------- A key to the understanding of all religion is that a god's idea of amusement is Snakes And Ladders with greased rungs. -- Terry Pratchett, "Wyrd Sisters" ---------------------------------------------------- -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail