Return to the archive index

Cells and Stations and Radios! Oh my! Was Re: Packet radio

From: legacy <>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 13:00:52 -0700

I just had an interesting idea-- and another way to really get the FCC on your
back..  Timeline was/is selling Analogue Cell Station Transceivers;  Could one
get a Cell station and an old Analogue Cell phone (Like my Nokia 211) with a cell
modem and connect the two?  Hack together some interface hardware to connect your
cell station to whatever boxen you have, and there you are.  Probably not much
faster than TNC, but perhaps more stable?

Tramm Hudson wrote:

> Brian Glenn wrote:
> >       Hey guys I just got my ham liscence and was wondering which or you
> > are using Packet Radio For linkup and if so is there anything not to
> > expensive for the 70cm band (440 Mhz) that is considerably faster than
> > 28,800 (like 57k or something) that I could set up two of for a point to
> > point connection...
>
> Years ago ('93 or so) I used a MFJ TNC with my Icom 2m base station and
> a KPC TNC-3 with my RS 2m HT.  The base was hooked to my SPARC 1+ (wow!)
> in my dorm room, which had an ethernet drop.  For the mobile side I used
> my HP-48 with a VT-100 emulator.
>
> However, 1200 baud with a very lossy link made it only slightly more
> usefull than a technical demo.  I could check my mail in class, subject
> to the rather stringent restrictions of packet content.  The KPC-3 would
> frequently time out and require me to reconnect.
>
> All in all, I don't recommend packet for wearable use for several reasons:
>
>   - Content limitations (Fuck the FCC!)
>   - High-power draw of radio equipment (One hour of runtime anyone?)
>   - Limited mobility (I couldn't leave campus without loosing the signal)
>   - Cost per station is very high
>
> The last one is really what changed my mind.  My Minstrel CDPD modem cost
> me $300 (and it is cheaper now) plus $50/month for unlimited service anywhere
> in the country.  My base station+TNC+HT+TNC+antennas cost me way more than
> that.  So, while the license is very cheap, the equipment is far more
> expensive.  Maybe if you build it all from kits...
>
> Anyone want to buy a slightly used MFJ TNC?
>
> Good luck,
> Tramm
> --
>   o                  O___|
>  /|\  http://www.cs.tulane.edu/~hudson/     H 505.266.59.96   /\  \_
>  <<   KC5RNF @ N5YYF.NM.AMPR.ORG            W 505.284.24.32   \ \/\_\
>   0                                                            U \_  |
>
> --
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
> Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.ml.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail