Both got through to here. Sometimes you need to give us time to think and catch up on our e-mail, I'm just getting to the middle of last week today! (You should SEE the disaster on another list I'm on, some jerks are using that list to harass other people they have a political beef with, so umpteen huge rants are being exchanged. I'm going to help in the solution, which is fine with me! But it's taking some time...) On a really cold day, I'd worry about hypothermia, is all I can say just now (It's been a DAY!) You're converting heat flow to power, I don't know how efficiently, on days way below 65 degrees F if you're pulling lots of heat out of some people they could freeze, others would be happy to be cool at last <G> Mark Robert S Evans wrote: > > It seems this message didn't get through: > > I was talking to my dad a little while back about power sources for > wearable computers. He mentioned the possibility of using the > temperature differential between the human body and the environment. He > said it would probably work if the differential was >30 degrees (F I > assume). > > Has anybody tried this, or know where I could get information relating > to this to experiment with? Coupled with solar power recharging, this > would be great, as it would work best at night (for trips, hikes, > etc...). > > -- > Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of > "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to> Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail