> Correct me if I am wrong, but the MicroOptical is just an M1 in a > different,. albeit, better (usually) form factor, using the same Kopin microoptical and m1 use same kopin display, but i believe the m1 is sharper and clearer, both owing to better optics, as well as better drive circuits. both are of course sub vga resolution, so you may notice that folks don't use them for continued lenghts of time. i'd suggest 480x640 as min. resolution for extended usage. > QVGA display panel, and same/.similiar controls on the box as the M1, just > its all custom there lies the price. The color version will be the same > display just sequential color, flashing r/g/b really fast to make it seem > like full color. Th ecolorado Microdisplay is 640x480 b/w, but is a little > big to mount in glasses, unluss you want coke botles. I am assuming. > > I would love to know what is behind Mann's dark glasses he currently wears > sometimes. darkglass display is a different philisophy, e.g. not just augmented reality but mediated reality (e.g. filter out advertising, etc., as described this month's issue = march 1999 linux journal). currently i'm looking for licensees for manufacture of this technology. i've got two kinds of new tech., the clearglass system (partial mediation) and the darkglass (full mediation). the darkglass system is a lot better (full colour full resolution, and better colour fidelity, better tonal range, etc.) i think the darkglass is going to be the way to go (rather than clearglass which can never, for example, filter out something. adbusting and blab off for getting rid of spam from billboards, needs dark). > Bryan -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail