>$5,000 considering the convenience they offer. But, then again, you don't >seem to wear your pair very often--that's why I was curious. :-) That is changing. My MicroOpticals were the first of their kind (I'm particularly difficult to fit) and have the expected glitches - one of the most significant is that the mirror was mounted too low (look carefully at the picture and you can see the nose pads :-) Another problem, of course, is the 320x240 when you are using your wearable instead of a desktop. However, the technology has improved significantly and I'm in the middle of a new fit. It also takes time to get up to speed as a new professor - notice no web page yet (I'm hiding) - so I haven't had time to make the dedicated MicroOptical machine. My advice, as always, is to get the best equipment you can, put together a machine, and figure out what you really want to do with it and its inadequacies vs. your preconceptions. It takes patience and a conviction that this is the right path, because right now the equipment available is inadequate. To me, this is not an experiment, nor a hobby, but a better way of life. Thad Starner Future Computing Environments Georgia Tech -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail