>I don't believe so. Seems that the hardware that drives the display is >built into some kind of big custom chip (or somesuch). The info is >somewhere on http://www.wearcam.org (I think). The Virtual Boy is not worth it. 384x256 res. Bad vibration problems without counterbalancing. We put the info on http://wearables.www.media.mit.edu/projects/wearables/vboy I think. Thad -- Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" toWear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail