Return to the archive index

Re: Good HMDs - Was: help!!!

From: Rehmi Post <>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 19:22:55 -0400

Tony Havelka wrote:
> > The biggest problem still facing us all is the lack of a good,
> > in-production head-mounted display suitable for constant use.

> It is quite interesting that some people ... are "holding off" on
> purchasing a commercial HMD because there isn't one available that
> will do 800x600.

(flame #t)

I would be happy for now with a 640x480x1 bit display with awful contrast ratio
if I didn't have to pay the power necessary to generate VGA and then resample it
back down to LCD control signals.

I would love to instead have a smart graphics terminal emulator running at the
display itself, which would accept something like a 115kbps data stream with
high-level graphics primitives (bitblt, outline/path stroke/fill, etc.; think of
the BBN BitGraph, for example) but for the fact that none of the display vendors
are interested in really revolutionizing the experimenter's HMD market segment
by generating a thin display server.

The Private Eye took the first step in this direction by putting the frame
buffer on the display itself and using a simple protocol over a synchronous
serial link to refresh portions of the display.  This is ten year old
technology, folks.

The thing to do now is to put a tiny amount of intelligence on the
microcontroller, allowing it to handle soft fonts and block transfers in that
frame buffer, rather than carrying a high-bandwidth, easily corrupted analog
signal from the power-hungry VGA adapter to the power-hungry scan converter, or
worse, carrying several digital LCD control signals over several unmatched
lines.

To reiterate for the elegance-impaired, I need to be able to talk to my display
using a high-level description rather than a high-bandwidth connection.  The
typical display engineer's ignorance of this concept borders on criminal
negligence.

The up-front IP issues for the wise display vendors will be 1) retargeting their
FPGA-based scan-converter to be a simple graphics protocol interpreter and 2)
developing drivers for Linux and Windows which interface to the virtual display.
Then they will release the protocol for the graphics engine, sit back, and watch
the orders roll in from all of us pimply-faced hackers still capable of
recognizing an elegant solution.

The unwise display vendors will spend their last shreds of VC condemning the
market for not appreciating the completely ordinary features of their product.

(flame #f)

	-Rehmi Post

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail