Return to the archive index

Re: Augmented reality and Mediated Reality (fwd)

From: Joseph Osako <>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 07:32:27 -0700

At 12:06 PM 08/02/1999 +0100, Neill Newman wrote:
>Steve Mann wrote:
>from what I have read about mediated reality I had assumed that it was
>not fixed to one type of human sensory perception. I had assumed that
>when Steve was talking about Mediated reality that it included mediated
>audio and possibly other sensory perceptions like touch and smell as
>well.. 

In principle it ought to, if I understand the idea correctly. In present
fact, full sensory modification isn't available yet. While we've got
audiovisual generation down solidly for the most part, touch is more
difficult; with current technology you actually have to cover the area you
want to modify the sensations of with a tactile generator of some kind, and
only a limited range of sensation can be generated, usually less than the
unenhanced equivalent. And for taste and smell, short of carrying around a
selection of perfumes and flavor extracts and spraying them from time to
time into the nose and mouth, there is no way AFIAK to artificially
stimulate those senses. 

This kind of immersive technology is real bleeding edge stuff, and today is
mostly studied by the simulated-reality groups. Mediated reality, since it
is supposed to provide an enhanced yet accurate picture of the world around
you, has serious issues involving synchronization: the stimulus has to
match the environment on at least some level. Again, while techniques for
sound and video are well-developed for this (AFAIK), it would simply be
beyond our current abilities to provide real-time full-sensory stimulation. 

Like so many things in the VR field, immersive MR will probably have to
wait until the development of pseudosensory induction, if that's possible.
It may prove difficult even then, becuase of the synchronization issues;
you'd still need the camera, sound equipment, pressure mesh, and some kind
of chemoreceptors in order for the computer to 'sense' for you, a factor
that doesn't come up in other areas of immersive VR. For now, at least, the
'limitation' of sight and hearing only is acceptable, I imagine.

Finally, with an immersive MR, you begin to blur the lines a bit, as you
can no longer judge from use of your unenhanced senses the accuracy of the
sensation, which could, if nothing else, lead to a feeling of dissociation
with the physical body. For some reason, the story, "Where am I?" (in
_Mind's I_; I may have the title wrong, but it was a followup by a second
author on a story by Dennett, in which the subject is given direct control
over a group of robots through induced reality, only to learn later that
one of the 'robots' was his own body) comes to mind, half-seriously.

J Osako
Programmer Analyst, Operating Systems Designer, Notational Engineer
http://www.slip.net/~scholr/resume.html

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail