Charles J Knight wrote:
> Here's a thought. Rather than a rotating disk, which allows only a
> very small viewing area, even with a fairly large disk, why not redesign
> it as a cylinder?
A cylinder won't be more compact, because of the product of scanline length and
number of scanlines remains the same. Managing a tape loop at this speed also
sounds problematic.
Good idea, though. You might be able to come up with a workable folded optical
path, but that will also increase the pixel size. Hmm.
Rehmi
--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org
From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty
Archive created with babymail