Return to the archive index

Re: HMDs

From: Neill Newman <>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 11:10:57 +0100

Chris Hardaker wrote:
> 
> How about a prism based device. use 3 primary colours (no refraction). If
> you project a beam onto prism and then rotate the prism, the beam sweeps
> from one side to the other. Once you transition over the corner of the
> prism, you should jump back to one side. That only leaves the vertical axis.
> If you can change the angle of light entry into the prism, then the prism
> should exaggerate the effect. So spin the prism, and then tilt is slightly,
> spin it again.. etc.
> 
> Sounds passable in theory.
> 
> Chris Hardaker
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thor Harald Johansen [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 12:15 PM
> To: Wearable Hardware
> Subject: HMDs
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I've been thinking about HMDs lately.
> 
> What's the cheapest possible way of making the smallest possible graphical
> display?
> 
> I've got this idea, it could be bad, but let's go:
> 
> Build some kind of a fast, tiny rotating device, allowing for rotation in
> both horizontal and vertical directions, directed by two currents (an X
> current, and a Y current). Put a very small, but focused light source on the
> front of the device (could be a led with a lens or something). Make
> electronics that controls the rotating device to steadidly increase the X
> voltage to the maximum, then increase the Y voltage one "step", and decrease
> the X voltage down to the minimum again. Repeat this until the max Y voltage
> has been reached, then reverse the process by decreasing the Y voltage
> instead of increasing it. At the same time as doing this, get the driving
> electronics to load values from a buffer, setting the focused light source
> to that value (a led has approx 2 volts max, so 0-255 will turn into 0-2
> volts). Aim this construction against a partially transparent surface (could
> be very thin white paper). Voila! You have a television screen using lights
> instead of a catode cannon, and a piece of paper instead of a phosphor
> surface. Of course, this way of doing it would cause some vibration, but it
> may be worth a try.
> 

correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a similar principle that is used
in the private eye ??
I know that the PE vibrates, and I thought this was due to a spinning
mirror inside ??

Scoobz

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neill Newman                                  Tel: Mobile 07970 673722
Department of Electronics Systems Engineering      Work   01206 873708
University of Essex                           Fax: Work   01206 872900
http://wearables.essex.ac.uk/index.html     email: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail