Return to the archive index

Re: is it a cell phone? or a wearable?

From: Eric Laforest <>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 15:31:05 -0500

On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 05:30:15PM -0500, Eric Laforest thus spake:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 06:24:33PM +0000, R. Paul McCarty thus spake:
> > There has been a recent surge of adds and products for cellular phones
> > with web access, email access, etc.
> > 
> > Let's be honest.. most wearables are built with desktop technology
> > scaled down to at minimum pc/104 scale.. but with such vast power
> > requirements for hard drives, fast processors, and displays that half
> > your weight is batteries.  A cellular phone weighs an order of magnitude
> > less and doesn't need as much power.  Of course this is mostly because
> > it doesn't have a high powered processor capable of driving a desktop
> > OS, or have enough memory to store anything more then a few addresses
> > and phone numbers.
> 
> The main advantage that cell phones have is that they are industrially produced
> and built using the best techniques (BGA chips, multilayer boards, etc..)
> available, while wearable users generally have to cruft stuff together
> until it's useable.
> 
> Given access to the same technologies, I'd say a decently powerful wearable could be scaled down to walkman (the bulky Sony Sport kind).

Hmmm...here is an exact example of what I meant:
http://www.pjbox.com/product.htm

It's application-specific, but would have enough power to be general purpose.

Eric

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail