Return to the archive index

Re: Wearable Construction

From: Charles J Knight <>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 23:06:49 -0600

> > > I've not heard much about the Nipkow disks lately, anyone?  
> 
> Next time I make photo film for PC boards, maybe I'll make a disk. 
> Could make a bunch at a time for not too much money.  If I can find 
> some
> LED array that has good density (like better than 0.8+mm between 
> LED's!)
> it'd help;  0.8mm LED width means that we have a limit of about 1mm 
> per
> LED, so 25.4 dots/inch, for the emitter array.  I'd really *like* 
> 300
> dpi, for a 640x480 HUD.

2 things -- why would you need an array for a nipkow device, since they
are supposed to use a single modulated source per display?  Unless
you intend to build an array of linked displays, like Rehmi did.  (4
displays
"on top" of each other, all on the same disk)

And, shouldn't the array used by the P4 be available somewhere, 
commercially?  Perhaps as a Nintendo Virtual Boy repair part...

BTW:  I took apart my VB, and the two displays are utterly independent,
physically.  Electronically, they are both fed from the same board, which
implies that if there is a link it is probably the sync signal from the
driver
board.  Nothing else, including the display information (displays are 
independently addressable) is common to them both.

> I've seen the Model 100 rigged for data logging in the Arctic;  You
> 
> batteries, which do OK in the cold as well.)  Good machine for it's
> time, and fairly expandable.  (Electrolytics don't freeze well...)

It's actually a pretty good machine for any time.  I wish someone
would produce a pocket version of the M100 -- the Game Boy is 
a Z80 based machine, so it's "close."

The whole thing could fit into my phone number "organizer," and
still have a decent keyboard.

Doesn't seem like it'd be too hard to produce a "programmable
organizer" device, based on the M100.

> Newer machine IS faster, it's just that some coding is good at 

Of course -- but Win95 is so pathetically inefficient, and ridiculously
bloated, that I can't stand using it.  W98 is slightly more efficient,
but still just as bloated.

> nice tight self-modifying assembly, but so few can cope with it <G>

Actually, tomorrow is the last day of my assembly course, other
than the final exam, at least.

     -- Chuck Knight
___________________________________________________________________
Why pay more to get Web access?
Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

--
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to 
Wear-Hard Mailing List Archive (searchable): http://wearables.blu.org

+Previous Message in Thread | Next Message in Thread

From Wear-Hard Mailing list Archive (WH)
Maintained by R. Paul McCarty

Archive created with babymail